Monday, 19 March 2012

Road Lurks Ahead

Although privatisation of the railway system failed to keep the promise of cheaper fares, motorists will no longer need to buy a rail ticket just to be ripped off for much longer because the next move in the great Tory ideologically culture is on track to privatise their roads as well...

This of course would seem like a good train of thought for owners of older vehicles because if they keep a car on a private road, they will not be obliged to pay for road fund licences, insurance policies, MOT tests, driving licenses  or any other outlay that doesn’t actually improve the performances of their (t)rusty steeds.   Where else could drivers on a ban drink and drive legally anyway ?

I would never drink and drive myself; not even coffee…  It goes all down me and coffee only keeps me awake at the wheel anyway…  Not being bound to the speed limit would appeal though..

On a more serious note of course, one quick set of laws will soon sort out the “Thou shall not remove our ammoniated water on a private road either,” loopholes.   Adding no doubt to around three million laws to enforce the ten commandments with still enough loopholes to keep barristers in luxury while they can all buy themselves a chunk of motorway with the windfalls as well now...

What does it mean to the average non road user?   You may well ask…
Well it means the same as it did when vat rose to 20%.   Higher fuel bill to deliver their groceries smartly handed down with their fish fingers and anything else exempt from VAT; yeah right…

Tuesday, 6 March 2012

Gay marriages/happy marriages?


I have a question of note...   If two musicians marry, would they be in a same sax marriage?
 What if of anyone who re-marries after a divorce etc?   The sex would surely be much the same during their second marriage as it was in their previous one.   They would be in a 'Same Sex' marriage as they were before...

“Not now love I have a headache”
She has the headache/he has the T-shirt...

That was silly I agree but then again, I find opposition to same sex marriages equally as daft…

 Yes, nowadays, once again, quite a few church followers maintain that marriage is still only a sacred union between one Man and one Woman.  (To each other that is) and Such blinkered folk cannot understand why two men or two women should feel the same commitment for each other as their heterosexual counterparts.  In such arrangements the headache sufferers become the bigots who think that gay couples are low life…   Even though being gay still means being happy so gay marriages must be happy marriages.

Sex isn't everything of course.  In fact I'm sure that if I put my mind to it then even I could think of other subjects sometimes?  (Yeah Right!!!)...

We never asked to be born and were not given the choice of whether we would grow up to chase men women or both.   Don’t get me wrong, I enjoy chasing women.   (The case comes up next week)…  But seeing that gay orientated people have no objections to me being a heterosexual and able to enjoy being happily married, (no comment), why should I or anyone else deny them a right to marry a same sex partner?

It still (normally) takes a man and a woman to create a gay (or miserable) child…   There’s room for us all…